Comments on: No kidding? http://www.caitlinjane.com/2010/06/30/no-kidding/ Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:39:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6 By: Caitlin Jane http://www.caitlinjane.com/2010/06/30/no-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-59500 Caitlin Jane Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:59:18 +0000 http://www.caitlinjane.com/?p=1503#comment-59500 Like we need more Scientologists in the world, eh? Up with baby gaga, down with multiple TomKats.

]]> By: Laura http://www.caitlinjane.com/2010/06/30/no-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-59489 Laura Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:11:07 +0000 http://www.caitlinjane.com/?p=1503#comment-59489 Allahkat! Those were my exact thoughts when I saw this!

There are celebrities spawning who I would much rather didn’t than Lady Gaga. At least she is interesting.

]]> By: Jamie http://www.caitlinjane.com/2010/06/30/no-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-59316 Jamie Sun, 04 Jul 2010 05:20:55 +0000 http://www.caitlinjane.com/?p=1503#comment-59316 I for one am pleased that particular DNA will not be replicating any time soon. But that’s just me :)

]]> By: Allahkat http://www.caitlinjane.com/2010/06/30/no-kidding/comment-page-1/#comment-59120 Allahkat Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:15:10 +0000 http://www.caitlinjane.com/?p=1503#comment-59120 Okay seriously? “No goo-goo for Gaga” would have been SO much better.

]]>